The
Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) on 4 September 2012 introduced a guideline
on the maximum allowable number of dwelling units for non-landed residential
developments outside the central area.
Maximum number of DUs per development
|
≤
|
MP Allowable GPR4 x Site Area
|
______________________________
|
||
70 sqm
|
With
this guideline, URA hopes to moderate the number of shoebox units that are
being built but still allows developers the flexibility to build small housing
units to meet the diverse needs and lifestyles of the population.
While
this will have an immediate impact on the number of shoebox units being built,
the impact on the property market is limited.
Take
a hypothetical example, a parcel of land with a gross floor area of 7,000 sq m
or 75,347 sq ft. Before the revision, developers can choose to build all or
majority shoebox units for the development. But developers are unlikely to do
so as they run the risk of missing out on another segment of buyers. And should
buying appetite for shoebox units turn negative, developers will be stuck with
unsold inventory.
Say,
the developer chooses to build 96 shoebox units and 20 3-bedroom/penthouse
units (total 116 units of which shoebox units make up 82.8%). If the developer
sells 100% of the development, the gross development proceeds would be around
$96.6 million. The average selling price achieved is $1,424 psf.
After
the revision, the maximum number of dwelling units the developer can build is
capped at 100. By changing the configuration of units for sale, now the
developer can choose not to build shoebox units. But the developer is still
able to achieve gross development proceeds of $96.1 million, close to the $96.6
million had it offered only shoebox units and 3-bedroom/penthouse units. The
average selling price is $1,417 psf, a negligible difference from the average
selling price before the revision.
See
table below.
Assume
Gross Floor Area 7,000 sq m*
Efficiency
90%
Net
Floor Area 6,300 sq m
|
|||||
Before Revision
|
|||||
Type of Unit
|
Shoebox Unit
|
3
Bedroom/Penthouse+
|
Total
|
||
Number of Units
|
96
|
20
|
116
|
||
Size (sq m)
|
49
|
80
|
54.3 (average)
|
||
Total Floor Area (sq m)
|
4,704
|
1,600
|
6,304
|
||
Estimated Selling Price (psf)
|
$1,500
|
$1,200
|
$1,424 (average)
|
||
Gross Development Proceeds
|
$75,950,078
|
$20,666,688
|
$96,616,766
|
||
After Revision
|
|||||
Type of Unit
|
1+1
|
2 Bedroom
|
Penthouse+
|
Total
|
|
Number of Units
|
62
|
30
|
8
|
100
|
|
Size (sq m)
|
53
|
76
|
92
|
63.0 (average)
|
|
Total Floor Area (sq m)
|
3,286
|
2,280
|
736
|
6,302
|
|
Estimated Selling Price (psf)
|
$1,500
|
$1,350
|
$1,250
|
$1,417 (average)
|
|
Gross Development Proceeds
|
$53,055,263
|
$33,131,284
|
$9,902,788
|
$96,089,335
|
|
*
excludes 10% bonus GFA for balcony
+
excludes roof terrace
Conclusion
The
example is hypothetical as it does not take into account the location,
surrounding developments and concept of the development but it shows some
possibilities a developer can consider. Thus the guideline has limited impact
on the property market as developers can find innovative ways like selling more
loft space, more private enclosed space or roof terrace to comply and yet
maintain their profits. They could even have a concept/themed development to
maintain or increase the selling price.
The
cap on the number of dwelling units however will go a long way towards creating
an environment conducive for couples to have children and allows the Government
to manage the planning of infrastructure better. Now the number of dwelling
units on a parcel of land can be known with 100% accuracy. This makes the
planning for infrastructure more precise. It also sets in place the mechanism
for the revision of the Master Plan in 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment